PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXJ.DE achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.DE's 25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXJ.DE has underperformed XDWT.DE with an annualized return of 9.20%, while XDWT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.00% annualized return.


DBXJ.DE

1D
-0.42%
1M
3.68%
YTD
16.95%
6M
16.85%
1Y
31.98%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
9.20%

XDWT.DE

1D
-2.03%
1M
12.76%
YTD
25.23%
6M
23.47%
1Y
47.87%
3Y*
29.29%
5Y*
22.52%
10Y*
24.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBXJ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C
16.95%12.59%13.75%16.43%-12.07%9.57%5.08%21.75%-9.54%9.08%
XDWT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
25.23%9.56%41.11%50.00%-28.10%41.76%30.98%51.77%0.78%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXJ.DE and XDWT.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.57

The correlation between DBXJ.DE and XDWT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXJ.DE
DBXJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DBXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWT.DE
XDWT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBXJ.DEXDWT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.12

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.82

8.24

+1.58

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the XDWT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXJ.DE and XDWT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBXJ.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.38

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.99

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

1.11

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.09

-0.83

Drawdowns

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.22%, which is greater than XDWT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXJ.DE and XDWT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXJ.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.22%

-31.61%

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

-15.59%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-29.46%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

-29.46%

+10.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

-31.61%

+3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-2.61%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-5.82%

-8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

5.91%

-2.79%

Volatility

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) is 3.40%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.DE) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that DBXJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXJ.DEXDWT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

7.11%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

14.96%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

20.39%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

22.55%

-5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

21.46%

-5.08%

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXJ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXJ.DE vs. XDWT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBXJ.DE nor XDWT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXJ.DE and XDWT.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBXJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.DE.

DBXJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XDWT.DE is Technology Equities. DBXJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while XDWT.DE tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DBXJ.DE and 0.25% for XDWT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXJ.DE and XDWT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer