DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE
DBXI.DE (Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBXI.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE MIB, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBXI.DE returned 19.73%/yr vs 18.79%/yr for XNAS.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBXI.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.
Performance
DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXI.DE achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.
DBXI.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 29.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 37.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF | 14.49% | 37.50% | 18.27% | 33.40% | -9.08% | 29.99% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -29.99% | 33.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXI.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXI.DE
XNAS.DE
DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBXI.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.77 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 11.16 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBXI.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.40 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.91 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.49%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXI.DE and XNAS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXI.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.49% | -31.25% | -38.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.62% | -10.00% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.56% | -26.72% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -31.25% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.83% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.56% | -7.83% | -21.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.38% | -0.71% |
Volatility
DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) at 4.31%. This indicates that DBXI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXI.DE | XNAS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.31% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 10.91% | +1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 15.71% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 19.88% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 19.84% | +0.53% |
DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBXI.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBXI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF | 3.63% | 3.93% | 4.53% | 3.78% | 7.45% | 0.94% | 4.23% | 3.33% | 2.66% | 1.94% | 2.51% | 0.15% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXI.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXI.DE.
DBXI.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DBXI.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXI.DE and XNAS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer