DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
DBXI.DE (Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF) and H4ZA.DE (HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR) are both Europe Equities funds - DBXI.DE tracks the FTSE MIB while H4ZA.DE tracks the EURO STOXX® 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXI.DE returned 14.91%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for H4ZA.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBXI.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for H4ZA.DE.
Performance
DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXI.DE achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZA.DE's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXI.DE has outperformed H4ZA.DE with an annualized return of 14.91%, while H4ZA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.
DBXI.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 14.49%
- 6M
- 18.42%
- 1Y
- 29.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.95%
- 5Y*
- 19.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
H4ZA.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF | 14.49% | 37.50% | 18.27% | 33.40% | -9.08% | 26.51% | -4.28% | 33.02% | -14.48% | 16.46% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 7.24% | 22.26% | 13.81% | 22.59% | -8.87% | 23.72% | -2.73% | 30.07% | -11.96% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXI.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2010 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DBXI.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXI.DE
H4ZA.DE
DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBXI.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 1.43 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 4.85 | +6.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBXI.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 0.98 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.69 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.59 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.41 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.49%, which is greater than H4ZA.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXI.DE and H4ZA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXI.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.49% | -38.41% | -31.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.62% | -10.97% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.56% | -16.40% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -23.26% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.46% | -38.41% | -2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -0.50% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.56% | -7.84% | -21.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.24% | -0.57% |
Volatility
DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) is 4.63%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that DBXI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXI.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 4.95% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 12.99% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 15.99% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 17.50% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 18.17% | +2.20% |
DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBXI.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBXI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than H4ZA.DE's 2.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF | 3.63% | 3.93% | 4.53% | 3.78% | 7.45% | 0.94% | 4.23% | 3.33% | 2.66% | 1.94% | 2.51% | 0.15% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 2.44% | 2.49% | 5.35% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 2.84% | 3.55% | 2.73% | 2.85% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXI.DE and H4ZA.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXI.DE.
DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DBXI.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXI.DE and H4ZA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer