DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE
DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBXD.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX®, while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBXD.DE returned 9.16%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBXD.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXD.DE achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 1.35% | 22.65% | 18.18% | 19.60% | -12.74% | 15.26% | 3.11% | 24.69% | -18.52% | 1.16% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXD.DE and XMME.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between DBXD.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXD.DE
XMME.DE
DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBXD.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.55 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 4.98 | -4.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 18.04 | -17.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBXD.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 3.00 | -2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.51 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.45 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.98%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXD.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXD.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.98% | -31.96% | -23.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -10.67% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.92% | -19.16% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -24.38% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -1.04% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.34% | -9.53% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 2.95% | +1.02% |
Volatility
DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) is 5.10%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that DBXD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXD.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 7.48% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 14.90% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 17.70% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 16.74% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 18.61% | -0.26% |
DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXD.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DBXD.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBXD.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXD.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMME.DE.
DBXD.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. DBXD.DE tracks DAX®, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DBXD.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXD.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer