DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE
DBX8.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) and XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBX8.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom, while XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBX8.DE returned 19.70%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for XMME.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX8.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMME.DE.
Performance
DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX8.DE achieves a 109.21% return, which is significantly higher than XMME.DE's 30.06% return.
DBX8.DE
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- 16.35%
- YTD
- 109.21%
- 6M
- 127.53%
- 1Y
- 227.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.74%
XMME.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX8.DE Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 109.21% | 77.39% | -18.45% | 15.93% | -23.95% | -0.54% | 30.13% | 14.92% | -18.04% | 5.84% |
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 30.06% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.57% | 21.91% | -11.16% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX8.DE and XMME.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between DBX8.DE and XMME.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX8.DE
XMME.DE
DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX8.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.55 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.67 | 4.98 | +5.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.63 | 18.04 | +14.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX8.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.17 | 3.00 | +2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.51 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.45 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX8.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than XMME.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX8.DE and XMME.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX8.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.01% | -31.96% | -36.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -10.67% | -10.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.70% | -19.16% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.29% | -24.38% | -16.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -1.04% | -4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.55% | -9.53% | -8.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.94% | 2.95% | +3.99% |
Volatility
DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.08% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) at 7.48%. This indicates that DBX8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMME.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX8.DE | XMME.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.08% | 7.48% | +9.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.48% | 14.90% | +18.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.73% | 17.70% | +26.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.53% | 16.74% | +10.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 18.61% | +7.42% |
DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX8.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMME.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX8.DE vs. XMME.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX8.DE nor XMME.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX8.DE and XMME.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMME.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMME.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBX8.DE.
DBX8.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XMME.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. DBX8.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35 Custom, while XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBX8.DE and 0.18% for XMME.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX8.DE and XMME.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer