DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE
DBX0.DE (Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBX0.DE is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Xtrackers, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. DBX0.DE is actively managed, while XDWH.DE is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX0.DE returned 6.92%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBX0.DE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX0.DE achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX0.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 6.92%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.
DBX0.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX0.DE Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.53% | 8.75% | 10.83% | 11.97% | -15.01% | 14.60% | 3.69% | 22.86% | -9.17% | 7.86% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 6.77% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX0.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010 | 0.34 |
The correlation between DBX0.DE and XDWH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX0.DE
XDWH.DE
DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBX0.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 2.24 | +1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 5.74 | +8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX0.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.17%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX0.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX0.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.17% | -40.65% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -9.82% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | -21.11% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.01% | -21.11% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.17% | -26.06% | -3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.35% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -7.34% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 3.83% | -2.43% |
Volatility
DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) is 3.16%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that DBX0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX0.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 4.52% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 10.23% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.09% | 14.17% | -4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 13.51% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 15.62% | -3.27% |
DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX0.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX0.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX0.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX0.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DBX0.DE.
DBX0.DE is categorized as Global Allocation, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DBX0.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX0.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer