DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE
DBX0.DE (Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc)) and NTSG.DE (WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Global Allocation funds. DBX0.DE is actively managed, while NTSG.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, DBX0.DE returned 19.52% vs 22.86% for NTSG.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBX0.DE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NTSG.DE.
Performance
DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX0.DE achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than NTSG.DE's 11.33% return.
DBX0.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
NTSG.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 1Y
- 22.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DBX0.DE Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.53% | 8.75% | 0.38% |
NTSG.DE WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 11.33% | 8.14% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX0.DE and NTSG.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX0.DE
NTSG.DE
DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) and WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBX0.DE | NTSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 3.67 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 12.89 | +1.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX0.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.17%, which is greater than NTSG.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX0.DE and NTSG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX0.DE | NTSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.17% | -19.64% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -6.26% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.24% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -3.56% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 1.78% | -0.38% |
Volatility
DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) and WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) have volatilities of 3.16% and 3.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX0.DE | NTSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 3.11% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 8.12% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.09% | 11.35% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 14.20% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 14.20% | -1.85% |
DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX0.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSG.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX0.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX0.DE nor NTSG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX0.DE and NTSG.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSG.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DBX0.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DBX0.DE and 0.25% for NTSG.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX0.DE and NTSG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer