PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

DBX0.DE (Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc)) and F702.DE (Amundi Multi-Asset Portfolio Defensive UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBX0.DE returned 5.57%/yr vs 5.43%/yr for F702.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) and Amundi Multi-Asset Portfolio Defensive UCITS ETF (Dist) (F702.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBX0.DE achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than F702.DE's 6.10% return.

DBX0.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.74%
6M
7.74%
YTD
9.59%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
6.68%

F702.DE

1D
1.11%
1M
-0.71%
6M
3.72%
YTD
6.10%
1Y
12.65%
3Y*
10.95%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DBX0.DE
Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc)		9.59%8.75%10.83%11.97%-15.01%14.60%3.69%22.86%-7.00%
F702.DE
Amundi Multi-Asset Portfolio Defensive UCITS ETF (Dist)		6.10%11.87%10.77%8.69%-10.51%7.98%4.12%13.10%-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DBX0.DE and F702.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2018

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between DBX0.DE and F702.DE has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc)

Amundi Multi-Asset Portfolio Defensive UCITS ETF (Dist)

Often compared with DBX0.DE:
DBX0.DE vs. F703.DEDBX0.DE vs. F701.DEDBX0.DE vs. MAGR.DEDBX0.DE vs. XS7W.DEDBX0.DE vs. MACV.DEDBX0.DE vs. MODR.DEDBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE
Often compared with F702.DE:
F702.DE vs. F701.DEF702.DE vs. F703.DEF702.DE vs. XS7W.DEF702.DE vs. WEBN.DEF702.DE vs. MODR.DEF702.DE vs. MAGR.DEF702.DE vs. V80D.DE

Return for Risk

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DBX0.DE
DBX0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DBX0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBX0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBX0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DBX0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBX0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
F702.DE
F702.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
F702.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F702.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
F702.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
F702.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
F702.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) and Amundi Multi-Asset Portfolio Defensive UCITS ETF (Dist) (F702.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DBX0.DEF702.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.77
1.19

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.57
1.73

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

1.93

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.83

7.51

+5.32

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBX0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the F702.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBX0.DE and F702.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBX0.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.17%, which is greater than F702.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX0.DE and F702.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DBX0.DEF702.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.17%

-16.81%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-6.51%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.55%

-6.83%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

-13.81%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.17%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.08%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-3.05%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

1.68%

-0.27%

Volatility

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) is 2.61%, while Amundi Multi-Asset Portfolio Defensive UCITS ETF (Dist) (F702.DE) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that DBX0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than F702.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DBX0.DEF702.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

4.63%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

8.61%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

10.62%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

8.52%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.35%

8.71%

+3.64%

Dividends

DBX0.DE vs. F702.DE - Dividend Comparison

DBX0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while F702.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBX0.DE
Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
F702.DE
Amundi Multi-Asset Portfolio Defensive UCITS ETF (Dist)		1.26%1.34%1.10%0.96%0.80%0.76%0.75%0.34%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

DBX0.DE and F702.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBX0.DE and F702.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer