DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE
DBX0.DE (Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc)) and V60A.DE (Vanguard LifeStrategy 60% Equity UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating) are both Global Allocation funds. DBX0.DE is actively managed, while V60A.DE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBX0.DE returned 5.70%/yr vs 6.17%/yr for V60A.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX0.DE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for V60A.DE.
Performance
DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX0.DE achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than V60A.DE's 8.36% return.
DBX0.DE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
V60A.DE
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- 15.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX0.DE Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.53% | 8.75% | 10.83% | 11.97% | -15.01% | 14.60% | 1.79% |
V60A.DE Vanguard LifeStrategy 60% Equity UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating | 8.36% | 7.04% | 14.27% | 12.37% | -14.11% | 14.23% | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX0.DE and V60A.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DBX0.DE and V60A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX0.DE
V60A.DE
DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 60% Equity UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (V60A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBX0.DE | V60A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 2.83 | +1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.95 | 12.61 | +1.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX0.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.17%, which is greater than V60A.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX0.DE and V60A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX0.DE | V60A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.17% | -15.27% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -5.61% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | -13.15% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.01% | -15.27% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.46% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -4.24% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 1.26% | +0.14% |
Volatility
DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBX0.DE) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 60% Equity UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (V60A.DE) have volatilities of 3.16% and 3.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX0.DE | V60A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 3.03% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 6.44% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.09% | 8.20% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 9.65% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 9.41% | +2.94% |
DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX0.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than V60A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX0.DE vs. V60A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX0.DE nor V60A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX0.DE and V60A.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V60A.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V60A.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DBX0.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DBX0.DE and 0.25% for V60A.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX0.DE and V60A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer