PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBX vs. AKAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DBX vs. AKAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dropbox, Inc. (DBX) and Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBX achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than AKAM's 37.39% return.


DBX

1D
2.95%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
-4.46%
6M
-5.65%
1Y
-7.52%
3Y*
0.29%
5Y*
-2.30%
10Y*

AKAM

1D
-0.72%
1M
-18.58%
YTD
37.39%
6M
34.34%
1Y
51.20%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
8.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBX vs. AKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DBX
Dropbox, Inc.
-4.46%-7.46%1.90%31.72%-8.80%10.59%23.90%-12.33%-29.55%
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
37.39%-8.78%-19.18%40.39%-27.97%11.48%21.54%41.42%-14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DBX and AKAM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.44

The correlation between DBX and AKAM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DBX:

$6.29B

AKAM:

$17.98B

EPS

DBX:

$1.83

AKAM:

$2.95

PE Ratio

DBX:

14.51

AKAM:

40.58

PS Ratio

DBX:

2.71

AKAM:

4.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

DBX:

$2.53B

AKAM:

$4.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DBX:

$2.01B

AKAM:

$2.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

DBX:

$819.80M

AKAM:

$1.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBX vs. AKAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBX
DBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
DBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AKAM
AKAM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
AKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBX vs. AKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dropbox, Inc. (DBX) and Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBXAKAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.24

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

2.01

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.49

6.10

-6.58

DBX vs. AKAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the AKAM Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBX and AKAM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBX vs. AKAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBX drawdown since its inception was -62.64%, smaller than the maximum AKAM drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX and AKAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXAKAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.64%

-99.80%

+37.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.43%

-25.61%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.39%

-46.84%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.52%

-46.84%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.76%

-63.41%

+26.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-82.57%

+42.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.52%

8.42%

+7.10%

Volatility

DBX vs. AKAM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dropbox, Inc. (DBX) is 11.31%, while Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) has a volatility of 13.68%. This indicates that DBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXAKAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.31%

13.68%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.66%

48.30%

-21.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.93%

54.45%

-20.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.35%

36.71%

-3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.84%

34.43%

+4.41%

Dividends

DBX vs. AKAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBX nor AKAM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DBX vs. AKAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dropbox, Inc. and Akamai Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M1.00B1.10B20222023202420252026
629.50M
1.07B
(DBX) Total Revenue
(AKAM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DBX vs. AKAM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dropbox, Inc. and Akamai Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
79.7%
56.1%
Portfolio components
DBX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dropbox, Inc. reported a gross profit of 501.40M and revenue of 629.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.

AKAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 602.31M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.1%.

DBX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dropbox, Inc. reported an operating income of 172.80M and revenue of 629.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

AKAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.49M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

DBX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dropbox, Inc. reported a net income of 114.50M and revenue of 629.50M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.

AKAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Akamai Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 106.32M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DBX and AKAM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AKAM has higher volatility (13.68%) compared to DBX (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBX dropped -62.64% vs AKAM's -99.80%.

AKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBX and AKAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer