PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBSCX vs. RPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBSCX vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBSCX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly higher than RPIFX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DBSCX has underperformed RPIFX with an annualized return of 4.28%, while RPIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.66% annualized return.


DBSCX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.81%
6M
0.87%
YTD
1.36%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
4.28%
ALL TIME*
4.31%

RPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
6M
0.78%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
3.67%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
4.66%
ALL TIME*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DBSCX vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBSCX
Doubleline Selective Credit Fund
1.36%8.46%7.78%8.55%-8.10%4.13%1.83%5.68%3.03%8.75%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
0.83%6.71%8.47%10.13%-1.96%4.67%2.42%8.82%0.39%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DBSCX and RPIFX is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBSCX vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBSCX
DBSCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DBSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DBSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBSCX vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBSCXRPIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.51

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

2.49

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

8.13

+6.42

DBSCX vs. RPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the RPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBSCX and RPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBSCX vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBSCX drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum RPIFX drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBSCX and RPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBSCXRPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.12%

-25.10%

+10.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.32%

-1.44%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.91%

-2.28%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.52%

-5.90%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.12%

-19.67%

+5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.39%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-1.33%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.44%

-0.10%

Volatility

DBSCX vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) at 0.31%. This indicates that DBSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBSCXRPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

0.31%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

1.69%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15%

2.25%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

2.76%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.91%

3.79%

-0.88%

DBSCX vs. RPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBSCX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RPIFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBSCX vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison

DBSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than RPIFX's 5.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBSCX
Doubleline Selective Credit Fund
6.10%6.50%7.09%6.77%6.67%4.68%4.64%6.04%7.43%9.01%9.73%9.53%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
5.80%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBSCX and RPIFX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBSCX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to RPIFX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBSCX dropped -14.12% vs RPIFX's -25.10%.

DBSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBSCX and RPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer