DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L
DBRC.L (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FVUB.L (Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBRC.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while FVUB.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBRC.L returned -6.84%/yr vs 6.60%/yr for FVUB.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBRC.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FVUB.L.
Performance
DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DBRC.L is traded in USD, while FVUB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FVUB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBRC.L achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than FVUB.L's 15.89% return.
DBRC.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- -11.80%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 1Y
- -5.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- -6.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
FVUB.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 37.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- —
DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -9.46% | 29.65% | 13.80% | -7.59% | -28.96% | -23.93% | 20.04% | 15.45% |
FVUB.L Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF | 15.89% | 45.73% | -27.98% | 32.98% | 10.60% | -16.21% | -19.81% | -11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBRC.L and FVUB.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBRC.L
FVUB.L
DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBRC.L | FVUB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.26 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 2.06 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.36 | 5.31 | -5.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBRC.L drawdown since its inception was -70.16%, which is greater than FVUB.L's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBRC.L and FVUB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBRC.L | FVUB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.16% | -60.84% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -17.93% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.03% | -37.72% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.15% | -37.72% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.62% | -13.56% | -30.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.51% | -26.92% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 6.96% | +4.43% |
Volatility
DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) at 4.33%. This indicates that DBRC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVUB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBRC.L | FVUB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 4.33% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 18.52% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 23.71% | -3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.52% | 30.22% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 34.61% | -8.10% |
DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBRC.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FVUB.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBRC.L vs. FVUB.L - Dividend Comparison
DBRC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while FVUB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.60% | 1.74% | 2.81% | 2.60% | 3.58% | 1.58% | 1.43% | 2.02% | 2.96% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.68% |
FVUB.L Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBRC.L and FVUB.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FVUB.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVUB.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DBRC.L.
DBRC.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FVUB.L is Latin America Equities. DBRC.L tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while FVUB.L tracks MSCI Brazil NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DBRC.L and 0.19% for FVUB.L.
Find the right allocation for DBRC.L and FVUB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer