DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L
DBRC.L (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EMVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - DBRC.L tracks the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index while EMVL.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBRC.L returned -6.80%/yr vs 15.16%/yr for EMVL.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBRC.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EMVL.L.
Performance
DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBRC.L achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than EMVL.L's 31.45% return.
DBRC.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- -13.46%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- -4.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- -6.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.36%
EMVL.L
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -9.38%
- 6M
- 23.78%
- YTD
- 31.45%
- 1Y
- 56.66%
- 3Y*
- 31.82%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- —
DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -9.29% | 29.65% | 13.80% | -7.59% | -28.96% | -23.93% | 20.04% | 21.82% | -4.77% |
EMVL.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 31.45% | 43.13% | 14.49% | 18.37% | -16.29% | 5.29% | 7.72% | 17.64% | -2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBRC.L and EMVL.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DBRC.L and EMVL.L has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L — Risk / Return Rank
DBRC.L
EMVL.L
DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBRC.L | EMVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.41 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 4.51 | -4.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | 12.55 | -12.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBRC.L drawdown since its inception was -70.16%, which is greater than EMVL.L's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBRC.L and EMVL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBRC.L | EMVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.16% | -34.95% | -35.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.03% | -12.49% | -13.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.03% | -16.42% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -31.61% | -26.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.51% | -12.45% | -31.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.51% | -9.51% | -22.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.38% | 4.50% | +6.88% |
Volatility
DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DBRC.L) is 6.02%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that DBRC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBRC.L | EMVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 10.34% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | 21.31% | -6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 23.82% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.52% | 20.71% | +9.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 21.39% | +5.12% |
DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBRC.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EMVL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBRC.L vs. EMVL.L - Dividend Comparison
DBRC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while EMVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBRC.L iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.60% | 1.74% | 2.81% | 2.60% | 3.58% | 1.58% | 1.43% | 2.02% | 2.96% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.68% |
EMVL.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBRC.L and EMVL.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMVL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMVL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DBRC.L.
DBRC.L tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while EMVL.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DBRC.L and 0.40% for EMVL.L.
Find the right allocation for DBRC.L and EMVL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer