DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE
DBPK.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Inverse Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBPK.DE is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Short Leverage (-2x) Index, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBPK.DE returned -27.15%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. DBPK.DE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBPK.DE achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, DBPK.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of -27.15%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.
DBPK.DE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- 6M
- -12.79%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 1Y
- -23.56%
- 3Y*
- -26.50%
- 5Y*
- -19.09%
- 10Y*
- -27.15%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBPK.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Inverse Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | -11.09% | -34.12% | -24.20% | -33.54% | 42.87% | -39.02% | -53.09% | -40.00% | 12.72% | -40.55% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 6.77% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBPK.DE and XDWH.DE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010 | -0.46 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DBPK.DE and XDWH.DE has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.46 to -0.18, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBPK.DE
XDWH.DE
DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Inverse Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBPK.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.28 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 2.24 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 5.74 | -7.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBPK.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPK.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBPK.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.58% | -40.65% | -58.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.27% | -9.82% | -20.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.12% | -21.11% | -48.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.98% | -21.11% | -56.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.99% | -26.06% | -69.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.56% | -0.35% | -99.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.93% | -7.34% | -79.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.61% | 3.83% | +12.78% |
Volatility
DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Inverse Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPK.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.52%. This indicates that DBPK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBPK.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 4.52% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.00% | 10.23% | +10.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.58% | 14.17% | +12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.45% | 13.51% | +21.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.85% | 15.62% | +19.23% |
DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBPK.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBPK.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBPK.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBPK.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DBPK.DE.
DBPK.DE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. DBPK.DE tracks S&P 500 Short Leverage (-2x) Index, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DBPK.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBPK.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer