PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBPG.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-8.60%13.51%53.27%44.01%-36.28%78.38%9.47%68.71%-12.05%25.82%
XDWH.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C
-2.47%2.21%7.44%0.04%-0.07%30.55%2.69%27.24%5.96%5.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBPG.DE achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's -2.47% return.


DBPG.DE

1D
4.05%
1M
-7.31%
YTD
-8.60%
6M
-4.02%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
27.52%
5Y*
16.83%
10Y*
21.28%

XDWH.DE

1D
1.29%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
5.35%
1Y
-1.28%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBPG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBPG.DE
DBPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DBPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DBPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWH.DE
XDWH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBPG.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

-0.08

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

0.01

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.00

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.01

+0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.97

0.01

+1.96

DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the XDWH.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBPG.DE and XDWH.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBPG.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

-0.08

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.43

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.56

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between DBPG.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBPG.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPG.DE and XDWH.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBPG.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.28%

-26.08%

-33.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.02%

-13.28%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.46%

-21.12%

-17.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.29%

-8.97%

-11.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-4.72%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.01%

5.71%

+4.30%

Volatility

DBPG.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.04%. This indicates that DBPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBPG.DEXDWH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

4.04%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.26%

9.29%

+17.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.85%

16.42%

+22.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

13.28%

+18.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.25%

14.71%

+17.54%