DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
DBPG.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - DBPG.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBPG.DE returned 21.51%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for 4UBQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBPG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.
Performance
DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBPG.DE achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBQ.DE's 11.15% return.
DBPG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 50.49%
- 3Y*
- 34.60%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 24.01%
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.51%
- 10Y*
- —
DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBPG.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 19.52% | 13.51% | 53.27% | 44.01% | -36.28% | 78.38% | 28.20% |
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.15% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 24.03% | -13.92% | 43.62% | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBPG.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DBPG.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBPG.DE
4UBQ.DE
DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBPG.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 4.10 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.66 | 15.73 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBPG.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.47 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.00 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.11 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPG.DE and 4UBQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBPG.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.28% | -23.35% | -35.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.43% | -6.93% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.46% | -23.35% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.46% | -23.35% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | 0.00% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -4.02% | -4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 1.81% | +2.21% |
Volatility
DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 2.81%. This indicates that DBPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBPG.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 2.81% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 7.61% | +8.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 11.53% | +10.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.11% | 15.27% | +14.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.48% | 15.39% | +16.09% |
DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBPG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBPG.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBPG.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DBPG.DE and 4UBQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBPG.DE.
DBPG.DE is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while 4UBQ.DE is S&P 500. DBPG.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBPG.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBPG.DE and 4UBQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer