DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE
DBPD.DE (Xtrackers ShortDAX x2 Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBPD.DE is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the ShortDAX Leverage (2x) Index, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBPD.DE returned -24.22%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. DBPD.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBPD.DE achieves a -11.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, DBPD.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of -24.22%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.
DBPD.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -7.46%
- 6M
- -11.30%
- YTD
- -11.42%
- 1Y
- -14.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.37%
- 5Y*
- -20.25%
- 10Y*
- -24.22%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBPD.DE Xtrackers ShortDAX x2 Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | -11.42% | -35.14% | -23.51% | -28.08% | 9.77% | -31.09% | -33.90% | -40.89% | 36.84% | -25.87% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 6.77% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBPD.DE and XDWH.DE is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010 | -0.54 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DBPD.DE and XDWH.DE has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.54 to -0.33, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBPD.DE
XDWH.DE
DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ShortDAX x2 Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBPD.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.28 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 2.24 | -2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 5.74 | -7.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBPD.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.15%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBPD.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBPD.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.15% | -40.65% | -58.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | -9.82% | -16.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.57% | -21.11% | -44.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.93% | -21.11% | -55.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.94% | -26.06% | -67.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.15% | -0.35% | -98.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.62% | -7.34% | -75.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.61% | 3.83% | +7.78% |
Volatility
DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers ShortDAX x2 Daily Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DBPD.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.52%. This indicates that DBPD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBPD.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.90% | 4.52% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.00% | 10.23% | +16.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.27% | 14.17% | +18.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 13.51% | +20.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.24% | 15.62% | +20.62% |
DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBPD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBPD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBPD.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBPD.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBPD.DE.
DBPD.DE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. DBPD.DE tracks ShortDAX Leverage (2x) Index, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBPD.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBPD.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer