DBP vs. FLRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBP (Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBP is a Precious Metals fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while FLRT is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Pacific Life. DBP is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBP returned 12.31%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for FLRT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

DBP vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBP achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 1.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DBP has outperformed FLRT with an annualized return of 12.31%, while FLRT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.00% annualized return.

DBP

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 8.68%
• 1Y: 42.65%
• 3Y*: 32.54%
• 5Y*: 17.43%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

FLRT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.55%
• 1Y: 6.08%
• 3Y*: 8.90%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 5.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBP vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund	2.13%	73.43%	26.71%	8.68%	-1.51%	-7.10%	26.79%	15.89%	-4.31%	10.58%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	1.83%	6.24%	9.18%	14.59%	-2.72%	3.18%	2.78%	9.44%	-1.14%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DBP and FLRT is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2015	0.06

The correlation between DBP and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DBP vs. FLRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DBP	FLRT
Financial Services	100.5%	99.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DBP vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBP

DBP Risk / Return Rank: 34
DBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DBP Omega Ratio Rank: 40
DBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
DBP Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBP vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBP	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	3.89	-2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	6.03	-4.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.95	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	3.43	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.01	12.62	-8.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBP vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBP and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBP	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	3.89	-2.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	2.61	-1.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.81	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.75	-0.32

Drawdowns

DBP vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and FLRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBP	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.89%	-20.96%	-32.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.48%	-1.78%	-23.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.48%	-2.87%	-22.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.48%	-7.60%	-17.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.36%	-20.96%	-7.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.04%	-0.15%	-22.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.42%	-1.41%	-24.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.67%	0.48%	+10.19%

Volatility

DBP vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.40%. This indicates that DBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBP	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.57%	0.40%	+7.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.87%	1.19%	+28.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.57%	1.57%	+31.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.91%	2.30%	+18.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	6.17%	+12.55%

DBP vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBP vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than FLRT's 6.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund	2.38%	2.44%	4.21%	4.47%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	1.26%	1.24%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.81%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBP and FLRT in my portfolio?

DBP and FLRT have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBP or FLRT?

DBP has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to FLRT (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

Which ETF is better, DBP or FLRT?

On 10-year performance, DBP leads with 12.31% vs 5.00% for FLRT. On fees, FLRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBP or FLRT?

Over the 10-year period, DBP has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBP or FLRT?

FLRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBP or FLRT?

FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 2.38% for DBP.

What is the main difference between DBP and FLRT?

DBP is categorized as Precious Metals, while FLRT is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.69% for FLRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.