DBP vs. EWT
DBP (Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund) and EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBP is a Precious Metals fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBP returned 11.21%/yr vs 19.56%/yr for EWT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBP charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWT.
Performance
DBP vs. EWT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBP achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 61.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DBP has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of 11.21%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.56% annualized return.
DBP
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- YTD
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.99%
- 5Y*
- 16.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
EWT
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 61.53%
- 6M
- 67.45%
- 1Y
- 92.18%
- 3Y*
- 34.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 19.56%
DBP vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | -3.82% | 73.43% | 26.71% | 8.68% | -1.51% | -7.10% | 26.79% | 15.89% | -4.31% | 10.58% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 61.53% | 28.38% | 16.11% | 23.97% | -28.90% | 26.18% | 31.50% | 33.36% | -9.90% | 26.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBP and EWT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2007 | 0.18 |
The correlation between DBP and EWT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBP vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank
DBP
EWT
DBP vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBP | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.55 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 8.53 | -7.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 25.15 | -22.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBP vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and EWT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBP | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.89% | -64.37% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.03% | -10.51% | -19.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.03% | -25.66% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.03% | -38.88% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.03% | -38.88% | +8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.52% | -4.19% | -23.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -19.21% | -6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.56% | 3.56% | +8.00% |
Volatility
DBP vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) is 9.06%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 13.55%. This indicates that DBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBP | EWT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.06% | 13.55% | -4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.70% | 22.68% | +8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.35% | 26.75% | +6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 22.95% | -1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 21.78% | -2.94% |
DBP vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than EWT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBP vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison
DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than EWT's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | 2.53% | 2.44% | 4.21% | 4.47% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 1.24% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.74% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 8.12% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBP and EWT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWT has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to DBP (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs EWT's -64.37%.
On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.56% vs 11.21% for DBP. On fees, EWT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, DBP has been the lower-risk option at 9.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.56% return vs 11.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.
EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.53% for DBP.
DBP is categorized as Precious Metals, while EWT is Asia Pacific Equities. DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.59% for EWT.
EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBP and EWT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer