DBM.TO vs. NVDA
Compare and contrast key facts about Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. (DBM.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Performance
DBM.TO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBM.TO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBM.TO Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. | 4.85% | 17.93% | 9.86% | 55.96% | -19.26% | 8.29% | 59.09% | 31.10% | -31.80% | 33.78% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | -4.56% | 32.54% | 194.55% | 231.55% | -46.72% | 123.44% | 118.54% | 68.25% | -24.95% | 70.40% |
Different Trading Currencies
DBM.TO is traded in CAD, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
DBM.TO:
CA$847.48M
NVDA:
$4.29T
DBM.TO:
CA$0.92
NVDA:
$4.90
DBM.TO:
10.55
NVDA:
35.88
DBM.TO:
0.27
NVDA:
19.95
DBM.TO:
1.34
NVDA:
27.30
DBM.TO:
CA$3.12B
NVDA:
$215.94B
DBM.TO:
CA$455.20M
NVDA:
$153.46B
DBM.TO:
CA$256.06M
NVDA:
$144.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBM.TO achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -4.56% return. Over the past 10 years, DBM.TO has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 16.75%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 70.87% annualized return.
DBM.TO
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 52.22%
- 3Y*
- 22.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 6M
- -6.39%
- 1Y
- 55.06%
- 3Y*
- 86.73%
- 5Y*
- 69.84%
- 10Y*
- 70.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBM.TO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
DBM.TO
NVDA
DBM.TO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. (DBM.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBM.TO | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 1.34 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | 1.98 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 2.71 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 6.26 | +3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBM.TO | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.34 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 1.39 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 1.45 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.09 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between DBM.TO and NVDA is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DBM.TO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
DBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBM.TO Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. | 5.79% | 5.98% | 6.60% | 6.76% | 9.74% | 6.95% | 6.78% | 10.45% | 12.28% | 7.60% | 9.33% | 11.72% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
DBM.TO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.02%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -63.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBM.TO and NVDA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBM.TO | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.02% | -89.72% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -20.21% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.24% | -66.34% | +22.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.09% | -66.34% | +11.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -15.10% | -84.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.96% | -36.40% | -59.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.37% | 8.05% | -2.68% |
Volatility
DBM.TO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. (DBM.TO) is 7.08%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that DBM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBM.TO | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 10.44% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.35% | 25.75% | -8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.92% | 41.31% | -13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.81% | 50.49% | -18.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.20% | 48.90% | -16.70% |
Financials
DBM.TO vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DBM.TO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
DBM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 81.94M and revenue of 644.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.7%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 51.09B and revenue of 68.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.
DBM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 19.06M and revenue of 644.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 44.30B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.0%.
DBM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. reported a net income of 11.00M and revenue of 644.23M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 42.96B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in a net margin of 63.1%.