DBM.TO vs. CLS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. (DBM.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DBM.TO or CLS.TO.
Key characteristics
| DBM.TO | CLS.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -11.45% | 68.90% |
| 1Y Return | 16.01% | 339.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.24% | 86.72% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 19.27% | 47.60% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 13.63% | 18.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.87 | 7.69 |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.01% | 44.61% |
| Max Drawdown | -93.38% | -97.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.02% | -48.79% |
Fundamentals
| DBM.TO | CLS.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$654.42M | CA$7.91B |
| EPS | CA$0.86 | CA$3.68 |
| PE Ratio | 8.73 | 18.02 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$2.48B | CA$8.33B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$407.40M | CA$640.30M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$173.33M | CA$572.40M |
Correlation
The correlation between DBM.TO and CLS.TO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DBM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DBM.TO achieves a -11.45% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 68.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DBM.TO has underperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 13.63%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DBM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. (DBM.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DBM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
DBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBM.TO Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. | 7.76% | 6.76% | 9.74% | 6.95% | 6.78% | 10.45% | 12.28% | 7.60% | 9.33% | 11.72% | 45.08% | 152.90% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DBM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -93.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBM.TO and CLS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DBM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. (DBM.TO) is 9.86%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 13.53%. This indicates that DBM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
DBM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Doman Building Materials Group Ltd. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities