DBLTX vs. DBLLX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX).
DBLTX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010. DBLLX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2014.
Performance
DBLTX vs. DBLLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBLTX vs. DBLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.20% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 0.02% | 7.86% | 7.20% | 7.00% | -5.05% | -0.21% | 3.53% | 8.57% | -0.04% | 4.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLTX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than DBLLX's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLTX has underperformed DBLLX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while DBLLX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.62% annualized return.
DBLTX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
DBLLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBLTX vs. DBLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBLLX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DBLTX vs. DBLLX — Risk / Return Rank
DBLTX
DBLLX
DBLTX vs. DBLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBLTX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 3.75 | -2.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 5.19 | -3.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 2.29 | -1.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 4.05 | -2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 21.50 | -16.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBLTX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 3.75 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 1.72 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 1.91 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.68 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLTX and DBLLX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DBLTX vs. DBLLX - Dividend Comparison
DBLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than DBLLX's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.43% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 5.01% | 5.27% | 4.70% | 3.74% | 2.41% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 4.93% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 3.19% | 3.77% |
Drawdowns
DBLTX vs. DBLLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLTX drawdown since its inception was -16.49%, which is greater than DBLLX's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLTX and DBLLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLTX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.49% | -10.13% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -1.35% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.49% | -10.13% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.49% | -10.13% | -6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -0.92% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.38% | -1.31% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.25% | +0.72% |
Volatility
DBLTX vs. DBLLX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) at 0.35%. This indicates that DBLTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBLTX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 0.35% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | 0.75% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 1.43% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.56% | 1.93% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 1.90% | +2.48% |