DBLSX vs. DSL
DBLSX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund) and DSL (DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund) are both mutual funds - DBLSX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by DoubleLine, while DSL is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 10 years, DBLSX returned 2.79%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for DSL. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DBLSX charges 0.41%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for DSL.
Performance
DBLSX vs. DSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLSX achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than DSL's 1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLSX has underperformed DSL with an annualized return of 2.79%, while DSL has yielded a comparatively higher 4.79% annualized return.
DBLSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.64%
DSL
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- -1.04%
- 3Y*
- 7.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $5.07M | $6.17M | $5.61M |
DBLSX vs. DSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 1.13% | 5.74% | 5.32% | 6.76% | -2.69% | 0.70% | 2.02% | 4.73% | 1.40% | 2.65% |
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 1.93% | -0.01% | 15.00% | 23.41% | -22.61% | 7.39% | -6.49% | 25.10% | -6.04% | 16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLSX and DSL is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2013 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBLSX vs. DSL — Risk / Return Rank
DBLSX
DSL
DBLSX vs. DSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) and DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBLSX | DSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 0.99 | +0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | -0.09 | +4.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.82 | -0.17 | +19.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBLSX vs. DSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLSX drawdown since its inception was -57.22%, which is greater than DSL's maximum drawdown of -49.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLSX and DSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLSX | DSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.22% | -49.51% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.72% | -11.16% | +10.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.72% | -14.43% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.71% | -34.18% | +29.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.22% | -49.51% | -7.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.96% | -5.87% | -39.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.66% | -8.70% | -22.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | 6.01% | -5.85% |
Volatility
DBLSX vs. DSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) is 0.54%, while DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that DBLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBLSX | DSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | 3.08% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.04% | 8.23% | -7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26% | 9.78% | -8.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.42% | 14.82% | -13.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.00% | 20.09% | +43.91% |
DBLSX vs. DSL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than DSL's 2.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBLSX vs. DSL - Dividend Comparison
DBLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than DSL's 12.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 4.13% | 4.64% | 5.09% | 4.49% | 2.50% | 1.72% | 2.37% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.42% | 2.52% | 2.47% |
DSL DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund | 12.31% | 11.71% | 11.38% | 10.78% | 13.67% | 10.74% | 10.69% | 9.33% | 10.39% | 9.11% | 9.53% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBLSX and DSL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DSL has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to DBLSX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLSX dropped -57.22% vs DSL's -49.51%.
DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBLSX and DSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer