DBLSX vs. DBELX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DBLSX (DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund) and DBELX (DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - DBLSX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by DoubleLine, while DBELX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by DoubleLine. Over the past 5 years, DBLSX returned 3.17%/yr vs 2.99%/yr for DBELX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBLSX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for DBELX.

Performance

DBLSX vs. DBELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLSX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than DBELX's 2.50% return.

DBLSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 5.51%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: 2.87%

DBELX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 3.44%
• 1Y: 13.11%
• 3Y*: 8.35%
• 5Y*: 2.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBLSX vs. DBELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund	1.06%	5.74%	5.32%	6.76%	-2.69%	0.70%	2.02%	1.36%
DBELX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	2.50%	20.86%	-4.37%	12.50%	-6.99%	-9.37%	2.61%	0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLSX and DBELX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019	0.27

Return for Risk

DBLSX vs. DBELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBLSX

DBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 97
DBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
DBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

DBELX

DBELX Risk / Return Rank: 35
DBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
DBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
DBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBLSX vs. DBELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBLSX	DBELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.76	1.81	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.30	2.55	+3.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.06	1.36	+0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.27	1.89	+4.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.69	6.94	+21.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBLSX vs. DBELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the DBELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLSX and DBELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBLSX	DBELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76	1.81	+1.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.28	0.42	+1.86
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.30	-0.25

Drawdowns

DBLSX vs. DBELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLSX drawdown since its inception was -57.22%, which is greater than DBELX's maximum drawdown of -21.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLSX and DBELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBLSX	DBELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.22%	-21.95%	-35.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.72%	-6.89%	+6.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.72%	-8.54%	+7.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.71%	-19.87%	+15.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.00%	-1.70%	-43.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.51%	-7.21%	-24.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.16%	1.88%	-1.72%

Volatility

DBLSX vs. DBELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) is 0.42%, while DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that DBLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBLSX	DBELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.42%	2.34%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.89%	6.32%	-5.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20%	7.23%	-6.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.39%	7.13%	-5.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.99%	7.45%	+56.54%

DBLSX vs. DBELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLSX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than DBELX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBLSX vs. DBELX - Dividend Comparison

DBLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than DBELX's 4.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBELX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	4.92%	4.41%	3.80%	2.03%	2.01%	1.98%	1.17%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund	4.55%	4.64%	5.09%	4.49%	2.50%	1.72%	2.37%	3.21%	2.92%	2.42%	2.52%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBLSX and DBELX in my portfolio?

DBLSX and DBELX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBLSX or DBELX?

DBELX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to DBLSX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLSX dropped -57.22% vs DBELX's -21.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.