DBLIX vs. LCRDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DBLIX (DoubleLine Income Fund) and LCRDX (Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBLIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for LCRDX.

Performance

DBLIX vs. LCRDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Income Fund (DBLIX) and Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DBLIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCRDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 1.57%
• 1Y: 7.65%
• 3Y*: 8.23%
• 5Y*: 3.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBLIX vs. LCRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DBLIX DoubleLine Income Fund	0.48%	6.49%	10.61%	9.69%	-13.31%	5.72%	-5.18%
LCRDX Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund	2.26%	5.03%	10.16%	11.25%	-13.00%	12.19%	8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLIX and LCRDX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020	0.19

The correlation between DBLIX and LCRDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DBLIX vs. LCRDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCRDX

LCRDX Risk / Return Rank: 43
LCRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LCRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LCRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
LCRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
LCRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBLIX vs. LCRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Income Fund (DBLIX) and Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund (LCRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBLIX	LCRDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.92	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DBLIX	LCRDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-22.75%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.06%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.28%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DBLIX	LCRDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.30%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	4.68%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	5.82%	—

DBLIX vs. LCRDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LCRDX's 1.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBLIX vs. LCRDX - Dividend Comparison

DBLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than LCRDX's 10.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBLIX DoubleLine Income Fund	4.11%	6.33%	6.32%	7.44%	5.45%	4.76%	4.10%	1.30%
LCRDX Lord Abbett Credit Opportunities Fund	10.35%	9.81%	9.09%	9.54%	5.10%	9.71%	4.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBLIX and LCRDX in my portfolio?

DBLIX and LCRDX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.