PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBELX vs. DEDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBELX vs. DEDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBELX achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly higher than DEDIX's 0.93% return.


DBELX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.12%
YTD
2.93%
1Y
10.10%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.21%

DEDIX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.20%
6M
0.46%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
4.36%
ALL TIME*
4.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DBELX vs. DEDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBELX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
2.93%20.86%-4.37%12.50%-6.99%-9.37%2.61%0.89%
DEDIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund
0.93%9.51%7.90%8.72%-10.60%0.56%6.81%4.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DBELX and DEDIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.45

The correlation between DBELX and DEDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBELX vs. DEDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBELX
DBELX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DEDIX
DEDIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DEDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DEDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBELX vs. DEDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) and Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBELXDEDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.89

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

7.06

-2.06

DBELX vs. DEDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the DEDIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBELX and DEDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBELX vs. DEDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBELX drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, which is greater than DEDIX's maximum drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBELX and DEDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBELXDEDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-20.06%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-2.46%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.54%

-3.01%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

-20.06%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-0.71%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-3.37%

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.66%

+1.41%

Volatility

DBELX vs. DEDIX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX) at 0.69%. This indicates that DBELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBELXDEDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

0.69%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.76%

1.92%

+4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.59%

2.22%

+5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.18%

3.39%

+3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.46%

4.05%

+3.41%

DBELX vs. DEDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBELX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DEDIX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBELX vs. DEDIX - Dividend Comparison

DBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, less than DEDIX's 5.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBELX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
5.22%4.41%3.80%2.03%2.01%1.98%1.17%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DEDIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund
5.37%5.76%6.69%5.40%4.96%4.42%4.38%4.31%5.59%6.04%4.02%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBELX and DEDIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBELX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to DEDIX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBELX dropped -21.95% vs DEDIX's -20.06%.

DEDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBELX and DEDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer