PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBE vs. FLGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBE vs. FLGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBE achieves a 69.05% return, which is significantly higher than FLGB's 6.91% return.


DBE

1D
1.79%
1M
0.60%
6M
61.38%
YTD
69.05%
1Y
57.89%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
11.34%

FLGB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.00%
6M
4.68%
YTD
6.91%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBE vs. FLGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
69.05%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%3.86%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
6.91%33.73%8.77%14.33%-6.00%17.14%-9.47%23.23%-11.60%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DBE and FLGB is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.22

The correlation between DBE and FLGB shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBE vs. FLGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGB
FLGB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FLGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBE vs. FLGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) and Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEFLGBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.89

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.10

6.34

+0.77

DBE vs. FLGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBE Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the FLGB Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBE and FLGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBE vs. FLGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBE drawdown since its inception was -86.69%, which is greater than FLGB's maximum drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBE and FLGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFLGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.69%

-42.61%

-44.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.72%

-10.26%

-14.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.72%

-13.13%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

-25.90%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.82%

-3.09%

-32.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.19%

-6.65%

-50.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.17%

3.06%

+5.11%

Volatility

DBE vs. FLGB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF (FLGB) at 3.85%. This indicates that DBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFLGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.20%

3.85%

+8.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.74%

12.60%

+20.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.99%

14.58%

+21.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.88%

16.62%

+13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

18.92%

+9.48%

DBE vs. FLGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBE has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGB's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBE vs. FLGB - Dividend Comparison

DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than FLGB's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.29%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%
FLGB
Franklin FTSE United Kingdom ETF
2.97%3.50%4.42%3.95%4.23%2.93%2.67%4.30%3.92%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBE and FLGB have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to FLGB (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBE dropped -86.69% vs FLGB's -42.61%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.23% vs 11.70% for FLGB. On fees, FLGB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGB has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

FLGB has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 2.29% for DBE.

DBE is categorized as Oil & Gas, while FLGB is Europe Equities. DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index, while FLGB tracks FTSE UK RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBE and 0.09% for FLGB.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBE and FLGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer