PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBE vs. CLOZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBE vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBE vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
64.73%-2.17%2.96%-12.07%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
-1.42%5.99%11.85%14.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBE achieves a 64.73% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's -1.42% return.


DBE

1D
-2.38%
1M
29.83%
YTD
64.73%
6M
58.04%
1Y
53.26%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
13.08%

CLOZ

1D
0.51%
1M
0.79%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
9.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBE vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBE has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBE vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOZ
CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBE vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBECLOZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

0.85

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

1.13

+1.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

1.23

+2.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.35

3.89

+2.46

DBE vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBE and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBECLOZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

0.85

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

2.55

-2.47

Correlation

The correlation between DBE and CLOZ is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DBE vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than CLOZ's 7.93% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.35%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
7.93%7.63%9.09%8.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DBE vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBE drawdown since its inception was -86.69%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBE and CLOZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBECLOZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.69%

-5.32%

-81.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

-3.90%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.46%

-2.66%

-34.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.53%

-0.37%

-57.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

1.23%

+7.04%

Volatility

DBE vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 1.37%. This indicates that DBE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBECLOZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.28%

1.37%

+15.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.46%

2.94%

+22.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.68%

5.50%

+26.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.57%

3.83%

+24.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.87%

3.83%

+24.04%