DBD vs. UEC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC).

Performance

DBD vs. UEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DBD vs. UEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DBD Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated	11.12%	57.74%	48.67%	34.65%
UEC Uranium Energy Corp.	15.58%	74.59%	4.53%	74.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DBD : $2.74B UEC : $6.54B
EPS DBD : $2.55 UEC : -$0.18
PS Ratio DBD : 0.74 UEC : 305.37
PB Ratio DBD : 2.49 UEC : 4.63
Total Revenue (TTM) DBD : $3.81B UEC : $20.20M
Gross Profit (TTM) DBD : $961.20M UEC : $5.72M
EBITDA (TTM) DBD : $336.10M UEC : -$104.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBD achieves a 11.12% return, which is significantly lower than UEC's 15.58% return.

DBD

• 1D: 2.50%
• 1M: -5.70%
• YTD: 11.12%
• 6M: 32.28%
• 1Y: 72.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UEC

• 1D: 7.83%
• 1M: -11.94%
• YTD: 15.58%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 182.43%
• 3Y*: 67.36%
• 5Y*: 33.28%
• 10Y*: 33.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DBD vs. UEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBD

DBD Risk / Return Rank: 90
DBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DBD Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

UEC

UEC Risk / Return Rank: 91
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 86
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBD vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBD	UEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.41	-0.42
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.93	-0.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.33	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	4.29	-0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	10.42	+2.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBD vs. UEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the UEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBD and UEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBD	UEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.41	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	0.04	+1.49

Correlation

The correlation between DBD and UEC is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DBD vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBD nor UEC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DBD vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBD drawdown since its inception was -25.76%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBD and UEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBD	UEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.76%	-97.40%	+71.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.21%	-39.97%	+22.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.16%	-32.97%	+23.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-62.42%	+55.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	16.47%	-10.91%

Volatility

DBD vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) is 10.59%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 23.02%. This indicates that DBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBD	UEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	23.02%	-12.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.42%	56.81%	-30.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.70%	76.25%	-39.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.32%	74.64%	-34.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.32%	73.48%	-33.16%

Financials