PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBD vs. UEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DBD vs. UEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBD achieves a 21.80% return, which is significantly higher than UEC's -2.91% return.


DBD

1D
-0.23%
1M
11.29%
YTD
21.80%
6M
21.00%
1Y
59.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UEC

1D
-1.13%
1M
-12.90%
YTD
-2.91%
6M
-9.21%
1Y
72.08%
3Y*
49.26%
5Y*
31.26%
10Y*
29.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBD vs. UEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
21.80%57.74%48.67%46.21%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
-2.91%74.59%4.53%67.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DBD and UEC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DBD:

$2.95B

UEC:

$5.56B

EPS

DBD:

$2.98

UEC:

-$0.22

PS Ratio

DBD:

0.79

UEC:

265.04

PB Ratio

DBD:

2.89

UEC:

3.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

DBD:

$3.86B

UEC:

$20.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DBD:

$994.70M

UEC:

-$18.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

DBD:

$366.00M

UEC:

-$114.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBD vs. UEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBD
DBD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

UEC
UEC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBD vs. UEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) and Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBDUECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.36

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

3.20

+5.16

DBD vs. UEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the UEC Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBD and UEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBD vs. UEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBD drawdown since its inception was -25.76%, smaller than the maximum UEC drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBD and UEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBDUECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.76%

-97.40%

+71.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.53%

-53.23%

+30.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.85%

-43.69%

+36.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-62.05%

+55.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.08%

22.58%

-15.50%

Volatility

DBD vs. UEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) is 9.74%, while Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a volatility of 33.54%. This indicates that DBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBDUECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

33.54%

-23.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.56%

60.30%

-34.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.12%

79.48%

-44.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.38%

74.84%

-34.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.38%

73.88%

-33.50%

Dividends

DBD vs. UEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBD nor UEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DBD vs. UEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated and Uranium Energy Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
891.80M
0
(DBD) Total Revenue
(UEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DBD and UEC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEC has higher volatility (33.54%) compared to DBD (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBD dropped -25.76% vs UEC's -97.40%.

DBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBD and UEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer