PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBD vs. AGYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DBD vs. AGYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) and Agilysys, Inc. (AGYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBD achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than AGYS's -11.51% return.


DBD

1D
3.27%
1M
-11.51%
6M
6.64%
YTD
8.40%
1Y
36.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
55.83%

AGYS

1D
-2.31%
1M
-5.10%
6M
21.22%
YTD
-11.51%
1Y
-8.55%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
25.41%
ALL TIME*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.74M$31.69M$35.96M
$28.97M$24.08M$24.87M

DBD vs. AGYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
8.40%57.74%48.67%46.21%
AGYS
Agilysys, Inc.
-11.51%-9.77%55.28%18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DBD and AGYS is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DBD:

$2.50B

AGYS:

$2.97B

EPS

DBD:

$3.07

AGYS:

$1.51

PE Ratio

DBD:

23.96

AGYS:

69.67

PEG Ratio

DBD:

0.06

AGYS:

0.40

PS Ratio

DBD:

0.69

AGYS:

9.05

PB Ratio

DBD:

2.68

AGYS:

8.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

DBD:

$3.87B

AGYS:

$330.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DBD:

$1.01B

AGYS:

$205.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

DBD:

$341.80M

AGYS:

$61.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBD vs. AGYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBD
DBD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBD Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AGYS
AGYS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AGYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGYS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AGYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGYS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBD vs. AGYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) and Agilysys, Inc. (AGYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBDAGYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.02

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.14

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

-0.25

+4.42

DBD vs. AGYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the AGYS Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBD and AGYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBD vs. AGYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBD drawdown since its inception was -25.76%, smaller than the maximum AGYS drawdown of -90.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBD and AGYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBDAGYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.76%

-90.96%

+65.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.53%

-55.93%

+33.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.91%

-25.81%

+6.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-33.33%

+26.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.39%

31.80%

-24.41%

Volatility

DBD vs. AGYS - Volatility Comparison

Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) has a higher volatility of 20.92% compared to Agilysys, Inc. (AGYS) at 16.93%. This indicates that DBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBDAGYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.92%

16.93%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.63%

37.56%

-5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.48%

54.59%

-15.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.24%

48.97%

-7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.24%

46.62%

-5.38%

Dividends

DBD vs. AGYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBD nor AGYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DBD vs. AGYS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated and Agilysys, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

DBD vs. AGYS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated and Agilysys, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

DBD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 239.60M and revenue of 930.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.7%.

AGYS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agilysys, Inc. reported a gross profit of 55.66M and revenue of 87.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.5%.

DBD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated reported an operating income of 57.40M and revenue of 930.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

AGYS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agilysys, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.74M and revenue of 87.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

DBD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated reported a net income of 15.50M and revenue of 930.80M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.

AGYS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Agilysys, Inc. reported a net income of 8.99M and revenue of 87.68M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DBD and AGYS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBD has higher volatility (20.92%) compared to AGYS (16.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBD dropped -25.76% vs AGYS's -90.96%.

DBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBD and AGYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer