DBC vs. SLDR
DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and SLDR (Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while SLDR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DBC returned 35.14% vs 2.52% for SLDR. Their -0.27 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SLDR.
Performance
DBC vs. SLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 29.16% return, which is significantly higher than SLDR's 0.71% return.
DBC
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 8.69%
- 6M
- 22.68%
- YTD
- 29.16%
- 1Y
- 35.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.95%
SLDR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.57M | $30.05M | $33.92M | |
| $33.40K | $696.33K | $674.26K |
DBC vs. SLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 29.16% | 8.10% | 5.58% |
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 0.71% | 4.60% | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and SLDR is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | -0.27 |
The correlation between DBC and SLDR shifts across timeframes, from -0.37 (1 year) to -0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. SLDR — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
SLDR
DBC vs. SLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBC | SLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.89 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 10.59 | -3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBC vs. SLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than SLDR's maximum drawdown of -0.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and SLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | SLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -0.87% | -75.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -0.87% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.28% | -0.01% | -25.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.07% | -0.14% | -45.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 0.24% | +4.75% |
Volatility
DBC vs. SLDR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) at 0.50%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | SLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 0.50% | +6.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.09% | 1.02% | +16.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.63% | 1.28% | +18.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 1.28% | +18.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 1.28% | +16.60% |
DBC vs. SLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SLDR's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBC vs. SLDR - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than SLDR's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.58% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
SLDR Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF | 3.68% | 3.80% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBC and SLDR have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SLDR (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs SLDR's -0.87%.
On 1-year performance, DBC leads with 35.14% vs 2.52% for SLDR. On fees, SLDR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBC has performed better with a 35.14% return vs 2.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLDR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
SLDR has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.58% for DBC.
DBC is categorized as Commodities, while SLDR is Government Bonds. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while SLDR tracks FTSE US Treasury 1-3 Years Laddered Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.12% for SLDR.
SLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBC and SLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer