DBC vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DBC returned 30.29% vs -39.67% for IBIT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

DBC vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 27.68% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.

DBC

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -8.35%
• YTD: 27.68%
• 6M: 28.76%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 8.27%

IBIT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -21.94%
• YTD: -27.41%
• 6M: -29.61%
• 1Y: -39.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBC vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	27.68%	8.10%	3.21%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-27.41%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DBC and IBIT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

DBC vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBC

DBC Risk / Return Rank: 64
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 3
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBC vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBC	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	-0.92	+2.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	-1.30	+3.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.85	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	-0.78	+4.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.64	-1.37	+11.01

DBC vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBC Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBC and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBC vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBC	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.36%	-52.11%	-24.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.91%	-52.11%	+42.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.14%	-49.45%	+23.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.19%	-16.53%	-29.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	29.64%	-26.07%

Volatility

DBC vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) is 5.20%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that DBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBC	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	12.07%	-6.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.11%	34.45%	-18.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.94%	44.10%	-25.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.22%	50.26%	-31.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.82%	50.26%	-32.44%

DBC vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBC vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund	2.61%	3.33%	5.22%	4.94%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	1.59%	1.30%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBC and IBIT in my portfolio?

DBC and IBIT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DBC or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to DBC (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

Which ETF is better, DBC or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, DBC leads with 30.29% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DBC has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBC or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, DBC has performed better with a 30.29% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBC or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBC or IBIT?

DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between DBC and IBIT?

DBC is categorized as Commodities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.