PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBC vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBC vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DBC having a 28.04% return and HGER slightly lower at 27.24%.


DBC

1D
1.06%
1M
0.28%
6M
22.51%
YTD
28.04%
1Y
32.59%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
8.53%

HGER

1D
1.45%
1M
4.67%
6M
22.40%
YTD
27.24%
1Y
37.54%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBC vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
28.04%8.10%2.18%-6.19%8.24%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
27.24%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DBC and HGER is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

0.88

The correlation between DBC and HGER has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBC vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBC vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBCHGERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

2.69

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.89

9.72

-2.84

DBC vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBC Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBC and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBC vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and HGER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBCHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.36%

-23.31%

-53.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-14.04%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-14.04%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.93%

-5.65%

-20.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.13%

-7.70%

-38.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

3.87%

+0.87%

Volatility

DBC vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) have volatilities of 6.10% and 6.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBCHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

6.04%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

15.46%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

17.48%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.28%

17.69%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

17.69%

+0.11%

DBC vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBC vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than HGER's 5.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.60%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.57%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBC and HGER have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBC has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to HGER (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs HGER's -23.31%.

On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 19.31% vs 11.43% for DBC. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 19.31% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.57%, compared with 2.60% for DBC.

DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.68% for HGER.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBC and HGER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer