DBC vs. FCSH
DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return, while FCSH is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Federated. DBC is passively managed, while FCSH is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBC returned 14.87%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for FCSH. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. DBC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FCSH.
Performance
DBC vs. FCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBC achieves a 34.70% return, which is significantly higher than FCSH's 0.65% return.
DBC
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 34.70%
- 6M
- 35.25%
- 1Y
- 46.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
FCSH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC vs. FCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 34.70% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | 19.34% | 3.74% |
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 0.65% | 6.42% | 4.66% | 5.45% | -5.87% | 0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBC and FCSH is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DBC and FCSH has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
DBC vs. FCSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBC
FCSH
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DBC
FCSH
-
Basic Materials
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Communication Services
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Consumer Defensive
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Energy
DBC
-
FCSH
Healthcare
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Industrials
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Real Estate
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Technology
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Utilities
DBC
-
FCSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBC vs. FCSH — Risk / Return Rank
DBC
FCSH
DBC vs. FCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBC | FCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.48 | 2.21 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | 3.44 | -0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.97 | 3.44 | +3.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.90 | 12.26 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBC | FCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.21 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.86 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
DBC vs. FCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBC drawdown since its inception was -76.36%, which is greater than FCSH's maximum drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBC and FCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBC | FCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.36% | -8.47% | -67.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -1.24% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -1.32% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.08% | -0.49% | -21.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.22% | -2.21% | -44.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 0.35% | +2.95% |
Volatility
DBC vs. FCSH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) at 0.61%. This indicates that DBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBC | FCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 0.61% | +6.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.75% | 1.53% | +14.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.78% | 1.95% | +16.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 2.90% | +16.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 2.90% | +14.91% |
DBC vs. FCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSH's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBC vs. FCSH - Dividend Comparison
DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than FCSH's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.47% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 4.08% | 4.14% | 4.44% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBC and FCSH have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBC has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to FCSH (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBC dropped -76.36% vs FCSH's -8.47%.
On 3-year performance, DBC leads with 14.87% vs 5.11% for FCSH. On fees, FCSH is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBC has performed better with a 14.87% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCSH is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
FCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 2.47% for DBC.
DBC is categorized as Commodities, while FCSH is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBC and 0.30% for FCSH.
DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBC and FCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer