DAX vs. KTEC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DAX (Global X DAX Germany ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAX is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX Index, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DAX returned 7.62%/yr vs -11.24%/yr for KTEC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.

Performance

DAX vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAX achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -16.16% return.

DAX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: -1.45%
• 6M: -0.46%
• 1Y: 2.74%
• 3Y*: 16.82%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

KTEC

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -11.70%
• YTD: -16.16%
• 6M: -17.79%
• 1Y: -16.98%
• 3Y*: 3.50%
• 5Y*: -11.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAX vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	-1.45%	39.00%	10.55%	23.62%	-18.47%	-5.71%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-16.16%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	-26.12%	-29.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DAX and KTEC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021	0.41

DAX vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DAX	KTEC
Industrials	33.8%	-
Financial Services	19.8%	-
Technology	15.2%	21.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	48.6%
Communication Services	5.9%	27.6%
Healthcare	5.4%	2.5%
Basic Materials	5.0%	-
Utilities	4.5%	-
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

DAX vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAX

DAX Risk / Return Rank: 12
DAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
DAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
DAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
DAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
DAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAX vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DAX	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	-0.61	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	-0.75	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.92	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	-0.56	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.58	-1.00	+1.58

DAX vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAX and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DAX vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAX and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAX	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.58%	-66.90%	+21.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.82%	-30.47%	+15.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.03%	-34.71%	+18.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.72%	-66.90%	+27.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-47.09%	+41.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.49%	-43.95%	+33.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.77%	16.97%	-12.20%

Volatility

DAX vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX) is 5.86%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that DAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAX	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	9.07%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	20.61%	-5.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.01%	28.01%	-10.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.44%	43.16%	-22.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	43.11%	-21.86%

DAX vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

DAX vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

DAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than KTEC's 4.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAX Global X DAX Germany ETF	1.50%	1.47%	2.24%	2.48%	2.80%	2.65%	2.25%	2.47%	3.33%	1.73%	1.78%	1.41%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.00%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAX and KTEC in my portfolio?

DAX and KTEC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAX or KTEC?

KTEC has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to DAX (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAX dropped -45.58% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

Which ETF is better, DAX or KTEC?

On 5-year performance, DAX leads with 7.62% vs -11.24% for KTEC. On fees, DAX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DAX has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAX or KTEC?

Over the 5-year period, DAX has performed better with a 7.62% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAX or KTEC?

DAX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAX or KTEC?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 1.50% for DAX.

What is the main difference between DAX and KTEC?

DAX is categorized as Europe Equities, while KTEC is China Equities. DAX tracks DAX Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DAX and 0.69% for KTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.