DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE
DAVV.DE (VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF) and BLCH.DE (Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds - DAVV.DE tracks the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity while BLCH.DE tracks the Solactive Blockchain. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DAVV.DE returned 52.28%/yr vs 56.84%/yr for BLCH.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DAVV.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BLCH.DE.
Performance
DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAVV.DE achieves a 27.16% return, which is significantly lower than BLCH.DE's 29.21% return.
DAVV.DE
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- 27.16%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- 47.52%
- 3Y*
- 52.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BLCH.DE
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 29.21%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 95.64%
- 3Y*
- 56.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAVV.DE VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF | 27.16% | -0.68% | 37.42% | 337.08% | -76.66% |
BLCH.DE Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 29.21% | 19.78% | 12.72% | 317.11% | -78.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAVV.DE and BLCH.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DAVV.DE and BLCH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DAVV.DE
BLCH.DE
DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAVV.DE | BLCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.67 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 3.03 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAVV.DE drawdown since its inception was -91.53%, which is greater than BLCH.DE's maximum drawdown of -83.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAVV.DE and BLCH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAVV.DE | BLCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.53% | -83.28% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.68% | -54.26% | +8.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.00% | -60.06% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.58% | -27.11% | -7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.77% | -43.92% | -13.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.79% | 29.73% | -4.94% |
Volatility
DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE) is 14.56%, while Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BLCH.DE) has a volatility of 24.26%. This indicates that DAVV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAVV.DE | BLCH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.56% | 24.26% | -9.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.57% | 55.06% | -14.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.12% | 74.71% | -16.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.78% | 76.55% | -5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.56% | 76.55% | -5.99% |
DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAVV.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCH.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAVV.DE vs. BLCH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DAVV.DE nor BLCH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DAVV.DE and BLCH.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLCH.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLCH.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DAVV.DE.
DAVV.DE tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity, while BLCH.DE tracks Solactive Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DAVV.DE and 0.50% for BLCH.DE.
Find the right allocation for DAVV.DE and BLCH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer