PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAVPX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAVPX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAVPX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, DAVPX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 12.19%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.16% annualized return.


DAVPX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
4.89%
6M
4.05%
1Y
11.52%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
12.19%

MRFOX

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.26%
1Y
9.04%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
16.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAVPX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAVPX
Davenport Core Fund
4.89%10.73%17.50%28.98%-20.01%22.90%13.78%32.89%-9.23%19.86%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
0.96%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DAVPX and MRFOX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between DAVPX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAVPX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAVPX
DAVPX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
DAVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DAVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAVPX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DAVPXMRFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.43

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.53

4.23

+0.30

DAVPX vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAVPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAVPX and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DAVPX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAVPX drawdown since its inception was -51.80%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAVPX and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAVPXMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.80%

-29.10%

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-7.03%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-7.91%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-12.98%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

-29.10%

-5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-1.48%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-2.36%

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.37%

+0.41%

Volatility

DAVPX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

Davenport Core Fund (DAVPX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 2.88%. This indicates that DAVPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAVPXMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

2.88%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

6.89%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

9.84%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

12.07%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

14.25%

+3.61%

DAVPX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAVPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAVPX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

DAVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, more than MRFOX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAVPX
Davenport Core Fund
5.15%4.43%2.94%6.31%4.71%8.10%1.16%2.24%1.30%2.48%3.37%3.97%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.60%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAVPX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAVPX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to MRFOX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAVPX dropped -51.80% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

DAVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAVPX and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer