DAUG vs. UXJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DAUG (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. DAUG is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

DAUG vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAUG achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 12.64% return.

DAUG

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 5.06%
• 6M: 5.61%
• 1Y: 14.84%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 6.34%
• 10Y*: —

UXJL

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 12.64%
• 6M: 12.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAUG vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DAUG FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August	5.06%	5.14%
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July	12.64%	9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DAUG and UXJL is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025	0.96

Return for Risk

DAUG vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAUG

DAUG Risk / Return Rank: 82
DAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAUG vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DAUG	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAUG	UXJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	1.96	-1.22

Drawdowns

DAUG vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAUG and UXJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAUG	UXJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.34%	-10.29%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	0.00%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-1.52%	-1.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DAUG	UXJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.68%	13.91%	-8.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.05%	13.91%	-5.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.27%	13.91%	-4.64%

DAUG vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DAUG and UXJL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

DAUG vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAUG nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAUG and UXJL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, DAUG and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DAUG or UXJL?

Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAUG or UXJL?

DAUG and UXJL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAUG or UXJL?

DAUG and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DAUG and UXJL?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and First Trust.