PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAUG vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DAUG vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DAUG vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DAUG
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August
-1.78%11.75%12.00%13.85%-11.95%6.71%8.01%1.66%
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
2.08%8.28%15.95%23.16%-7.04%12.58%6.19%3.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAUG achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 2.08% return.


DAUG

1D
1.57%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
12.26%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*

BAPR

1D
2.58%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.42%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAUG vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DAUG vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAUG
DAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAUG vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAUGBAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

1.99

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.74

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.69

11.59

-1.90

DAUG vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAUG and BAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAUGBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.88

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.75

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between DAUG and BAPR is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DAUG vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAUG nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DAUG vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAUG drawdown since its inception was -15.34%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAUG and BAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DAUGBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-23.91%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-9.19%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.34%

-15.58%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

0.00%

-2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-2.66%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.38%

-0.07%

Volatility

DAUG vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August (DAUG) is 2.99%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that DAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DAUGBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.45%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

4.26%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

11.90%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.01%

11.54%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.36%

13.25%

-3.89%