PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DATS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DATS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DatChat, Inc. (DATS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DATS achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return.


DATS

1D
-2.44%
1M
-24.88%
YTD
-6.43%
6M
-25.23%
1Y
-39.96%
3Y*
-28.07%
5Y*
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.28%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DATS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DATS
DatChat, Inc.
-6.43%-3.93%-37.98%16.24%-91.85%-11.40%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DATS and ^GSPC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DatChat, Inc.

S&P 500 Index

Return for Risk

DATS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DATS
DATS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DATS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DATS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DATS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DATS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DATS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DATS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DatChat, Inc. (DATS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DATS^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.41

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

2.93

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

13.52

-14.61

DATS vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DATS Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DATS and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DATS^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

2.24

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.47

-0.68

Drawdowns

DATS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DATS drawdown since its inception was -99.31%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DATS and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DATS^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.31%

-56.78%

-42.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.95%

-9.10%

-49.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.32%

-18.90%

-68.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.93%

-0.74%

-98.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.10%

-10.72%

-81.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.65%

1.97%

+34.68%

Volatility

DATS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

DatChat, Inc. (DATS) has a higher volatility of 19.28% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.93%. This indicates that DATS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DATS^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.28%

2.93%

+16.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.99%

8.99%

+97.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

158.94%

11.89%

+147.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

224.99%

16.90%

+208.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

224.99%

18.06%

+206.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


DATS and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DATS has higher volatility (19.28%) compared to ^GSPC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DATS dropped -99.31% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DATS and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer