DASH vs. LULU
DASH (DoorDash, Inc.) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. DASH operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, DASH returned -0.47%/yr vs -18.89%/yr for LULU. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DASH vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DASH achieves a -33.51% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -42.85% return.
DASH
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -33.51%
- 6M
- -33.81%
- 1Y
- -31.23%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
LULU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -42.85%
- 6M
- -42.05%
- 1Y
- -50.33%
- 3Y*
- -31.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
DASH vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASH DoorDash, Inc. | -33.51% | 35.01% | 69.63% | 102.56% | -67.21% | 4.31% | -21.57% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.85% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 12.48% | -6.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DASH and LULU is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.37 |
The correlation between DASH and LULU shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DASH:
$66.61B
LULU:
$13.72B
DASH:
$2.10
LULU:
$12.35
DASH:
71.77
LULU:
9.62
DASH:
0.11
LULU:
0.47
DASH:
4.51
LULU:
1.25
DASH:
6.53
LULU:
2.73
DASH:
$14.72B
LULU:
$11.20B
DASH:
$7.49B
LULU:
$6.24B
DASH:
$1.69B
LULU:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DASH vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
DASH
LULU
DASH vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DASH | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.78 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.97 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | -1.72 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DASH vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DASH drawdown since its inception was -82.49%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DASH and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DASH | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.49% | -92.26% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.97% | -53.88% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.97% | -77.66% | +29.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.49% | -77.66% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.55% | -76.77% | +30.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -27.61% | -15.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.70% | 30.26% | -2.56% |
Volatility
DASH vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
DoorDash, Inc. (DASH) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) have volatilities of 13.74% and 13.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DASH | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.74% | 13.47% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.95% | 32.76% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 44.48% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.01% | 42.22% | +11.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.03% | 40.62% | +16.41% |
Dividends
DASH vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither DASH nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DASH vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DoorDash, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DASH vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
DASH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.04B and revenue of 4.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
DASH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported an operating income of 151.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
DASH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DoorDash, Inc. reported a net income of 184.00M and revenue of 4.04B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DASH and LULU have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DASH has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to LULU (13.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DASH dropped -82.49% vs LULU's -92.26%.
DASH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DASH and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer