DAPP vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - DAPP tracks the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DAPP returned 59.16%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KROP. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

DAPP vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPP achieves a 31.34% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.59% return.

DAPP

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 4.58%
• YTD: 31.34%
• 6M: 10.15%
• 1Y: 50.76%
• 3Y*: 59.16%
• 5Y*: -0.41%
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 0.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAPP vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	31.34%	15.03%	44.87%	285.02%	-85.60%	-8.47%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.59%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPP and KROP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between DAPP and KROP has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DAPP vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DAPP	KROP
Financial Services	68.5%	-
Technology	28.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.7%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	32.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	26.3%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.3%
Industrials	-	39.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DAPP vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPP

DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 24
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 26
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 19

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 23
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPP vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DAPP	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	0.81	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.24	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.15	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.06	1.14	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.07	2.58	-0.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DAPP vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPP and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DAPP	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	0.81	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	-0.57	+0.49

Drawdowns

DAPP vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than KROP's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DAPP	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.90%	-61.96%	-29.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.21%	-11.29%	-36.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.88%	-28.70%	-30.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.99%	-48.93%	+20.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.40%	-44.50%	-12.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.58%	4.99%	+19.59%

Volatility

DAPP vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a higher volatility of 15.08% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that DAPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DAPP	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.08%	4.69%	+10.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.27%	11.98%	+34.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.53%	16.04%	+45.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.90%	22.27%	+50.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.62%	22.27%	+50.35%

DAPP vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DAPP and KROP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

DAPP vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	0.00%	0.00%	10.13%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.34%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DAPP and KROP in my portfolio?

DAPP and KROP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DAPP or KROP?

DAPP has higher volatility (15.08%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAPP dropped -91.90% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, DAPP or KROP?

On 3-year performance, DAPP leads with 59.16% vs 0.72% for KROP. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DAPP or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, DAPP has performed better with a 59.16% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DAPP or KROP?

DAPP and KROP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DAPP or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.

What is the main difference between DAPP and KROP?

DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.