PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAPP vs. BRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAPP vs. BRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPP achieves a 31.34% return, which is significantly higher than BRF's 5.52% return.


DAPP

1D
-1.27%
1M
4.58%
YTD
31.34%
6M
10.15%
1Y
50.76%
3Y*
59.16%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*

BRF

1D
0.41%
1M
-11.58%
YTD
5.52%
6M
-1.66%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
-3.31%
10Y*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAPP vs. BRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
31.34%15.03%44.87%285.02%-85.60%-38.65%
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.52%54.17%-35.02%37.21%-14.38%-15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPP and BRF is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.32

DAPP vs. BRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DAPP
BRF

Financial Services

68.5%
8.9%

Technology

28.8%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
14.2%

Basic Materials

-

12.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

10.3%

Energy

-

5.7%

Healthcare

-

6.0%

Industrials

-

13.5%

Real Estate

-

14.1%

Utilities

-

9.4%

Financial Services

DAPP
68.5%
BRF
8.9%

Technology

DAPP
28.8%
BRF
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DAPP
2.7%
BRF
14.2%

Basic Materials

DAPP

-

BRF
12.9%

Communication Services

DAPP

-

BRF

-

Consumer Defensive

DAPP

-

BRF
10.3%

Energy

DAPP

-

BRF
5.7%

Healthcare

DAPP

-

BRF
6.0%

Industrials

DAPP

-

BRF
13.5%

Real Estate

DAPP

-

BRF
14.1%

Utilities

DAPP

-

BRF
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAPP vs. BRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPP
DAPP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BRF
BRF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPP vs. BRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) and VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAPPBRFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

1.31

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

3.63

-1.56

DAPP vs. BRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPP Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the BRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPP and BRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAPPBRFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.74

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.11

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.06

-0.13

Drawdowns

DAPP vs. BRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPP drawdown since its inception was -91.90%, which is greater than BRF's maximum drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP and BRF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAPPBRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.90%

-82.26%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.21%

-16.11%

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.88%

-37.81%

-21.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.90%

-50.49%

-41.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.99%

-48.56%

+20.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.40%

-45.74%

-11.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.58%

5.80%

+18.78%

Volatility

DAPP vs. BRF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a higher volatility of 15.08% compared to VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF (BRF) at 10.09%. This indicates that DAPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAPPBRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.08%

10.09%

+4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.27%

24.34%

+21.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.53%

28.38%

+33.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.90%

31.64%

+41.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.62%

33.93%

+38.69%

DAPP vs. BRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BRF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAPP vs. BRF - Dividend Comparison

DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRF
VanEck Vectors Brazil Small-Cap ETF
5.25%5.54%4.08%5.02%4.13%2.96%1.66%2.54%2.89%4.53%4.25%3.84%
DAPP
VanEck Digital Transformation ETF
0.00%0.00%4.04%0.00%0.00%10.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAPP and BRF have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAPP has higher volatility (15.08%) compared to BRF (10.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAPP dropped -91.90% vs BRF's -82.26%.

On 5-year performance, DAPP leads with -0.41% vs -3.31% for BRF. On fees, DAPP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BRF has been the lower-risk option at 10.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DAPP has performed better with a -0.41% return vs -3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DAPP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BRF.

BRF has the higher dividend yield at 5.25%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.

DAPP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BRF is Latin America Equities. DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index, while BRF tracks MVIS Brazil Small-Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DAPP and 0.60% for BRF.

DAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAPP and BRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer