PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAPP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DAPP.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAPP.L achieves a 29.21% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.65% return.


DAPP.L

1D
-2.84%
1M
5.89%
YTD
29.21%
6M
10.43%
1Y
50.42%
3Y*
56.66%
5Y*
-2.12%
10Y*

TDGB.L

1D
0.53%
1M
0.06%
YTD
8.65%
6M
12.64%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DAPP.L
VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc
29.21%9.71%29.53%351.01%-86.77%-27.60%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.65%40.76%8.81%14.81%9.40%2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DAPP.L and TDGB.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.32

The correlation between DAPP.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DAPP.L
TDGB.L

Financial Services

61.9%
31.7%

Technology

34.6%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
3.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

8.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.1%

Energy

-

19.7%

Healthcare

-

14.4%

Industrials

-

3.9%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

6.2%

Financial Services

DAPP.L
61.9%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Technology

DAPP.L
34.6%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DAPP.L
3.5%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

DAPP.L

-

TDGB.L
1.2%

Communication Services

DAPP.L

-

TDGB.L
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

DAPP.L

-

TDGB.L
10.1%

Energy

DAPP.L

-

TDGB.L
19.7%

Healthcare

DAPP.L

-

TDGB.L
14.4%

Industrials

DAPP.L

-

TDGB.L
3.9%

Real Estate

DAPP.L

-

TDGB.L
0.0%

Utilities

DAPP.L

-

TDGB.L
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAPP.L
DAPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DAPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DAPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAPP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAPP.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.46

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

5.52

-4.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.02

15.71

-13.69

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAPP.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAPP.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.53

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

1.16

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.88

-0.94

Drawdowns

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAPP.L drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAPP.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.21%

-37.43%

-54.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.39%

-5.06%

-41.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.14%

-13.67%

-44.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.21%

-18.93%

-73.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.98%

-1.86%

-32.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.08%

-4.33%

-54.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.87%

1.78%

+23.09%

Volatility

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAPP.L) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that DAPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAPP.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.16%

2.78%

+14.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.49%

8.06%

+33.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.79%

11.05%

+47.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.09%

14.21%

+62.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.87%

16.79%

+60.08%

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAPP.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

DAPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DAPP.L
VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAPP.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDGB.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDGB.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DAPP.L.

DAPP.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. DAPP.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DAPP.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAPP.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer