DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L
DAPP.L (VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAPP.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DAPP.L returned -2.12%/yr vs 16.46%/yr for TDGB.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DAPP.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.
Performance
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DAPP.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAPP.L achieves a 29.21% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.65% return.
DAPP.L
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- YTD
- 29.21%
- 6M
- 10.43%
- 1Y
- 50.42%
- 3Y*
- 56.66%
- 5Y*
- -2.12%
- 10Y*
- —
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- 16.46%
- 10Y*
- —
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAPP.L VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 29.21% | 9.71% | 29.53% | 351.01% | -86.77% | -27.60% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 8.65% | 40.76% | 8.81% | 14.81% | 9.40% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAPP.L and TDGB.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.32 |
The correlation between DAPP.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DAPP.L
TDGB.L
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DAPP.L
TDGB.L
Technology
DAPP.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
DAPP.L
TDGB.L
Basic Materials
DAPP.L
-
TDGB.L
Communication Services
DAPP.L
-
TDGB.L
Consumer Defensive
DAPP.L
-
TDGB.L
Energy
DAPP.L
-
TDGB.L
Healthcare
DAPP.L
-
TDGB.L
Industrials
DAPP.L
-
TDGB.L
Real Estate
DAPP.L
-
TDGB.L
Utilities
DAPP.L
-
TDGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
DAPP.L
TDGB.L
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAPP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAPP.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.46 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 5.52 | -4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 15.71 | -13.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAPP.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 2.53 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 1.16 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.88 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAPP.L drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAPP.L and TDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAPP.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.21% | -37.43% | -54.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.39% | -5.06% | -41.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.14% | -13.67% | -44.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.21% | -18.93% | -73.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.98% | -1.86% | -32.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.08% | -4.33% | -54.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.87% | 1.78% | +23.09% |
Volatility
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc (DAPP.L) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that DAPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAPP.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.16% | 2.78% | +14.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.49% | 8.06% | +33.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.79% | 11.05% | +47.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.09% | 14.21% | +62.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.87% | 16.79% | +60.08% |
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAPP.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAPP.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
DAPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAPP.L VanEck Digital Assets Equity UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.20% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAPP.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDGB.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDGB.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DAPP.L.
DAPP.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. DAPP.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DAPP.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.
Find the right allocation for DAPP.L and TDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer