DANA vs. VGSH
DANA (Dana Limited Volatility ETF) and VGSH (Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DANA is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Dana, while VGSH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. DANA is actively managed, while VGSH is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DANA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGSH.
Performance
DANA vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DANA achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than VGSH's 0.48% return.
DANA
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGSH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
DANA vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DANA Dana Limited Volatility ETF | 0.37% | 0.81% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 0.48% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DANA and VGSH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DANA vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank
DANA
VGSH
DANA vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Limited Volatility ETF (DANA) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DANA | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 1.01 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
DANA vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DANA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum VGSH drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DANA and VGSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DANA | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -5.70% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.29% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -0.60% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility
DANA vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DANA | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92% | 1.29% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.92% | 1.97% | +0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.92% | 1.57% | +1.35% |
DANA vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DANA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DANA vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison
DANA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than VGSH's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DANA Dana Limited Volatility ETF | 1.46% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 3.87% | 4.00% | 4.18% | 3.31% | 1.15% | 0.66% | 1.74% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DANA and VGSH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DANA.
VGSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 1.46% for DANA.
DANA is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while VGSH is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Dana and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DANA and 0.03% for VGSH.
Find the right allocation for DANA and VGSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer