DANA vs. USTB
DANA (Dana Limited Volatility ETF) and USTB (VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. DANA is actively managed, while USTB is passively managed. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DANA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for USTB.
Performance
DANA vs. USTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DANA achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than USTB's 1.60% return.
DANA
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
USTB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 3.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $176.68K | $111.67K | $92.87K | |
| $21.34M | $16.27M | $13.32M |
DANA vs. USTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DANA Dana Limited Volatility ETF | 0.63% | 1.25% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.60% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between DANA and USTB is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DANA vs. USTB — Risk / Return Rank
DANA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USTB
DANA vs. USTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Limited Volatility ETF (DANA) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DANA | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.75 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DANA vs. USTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DANA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum USTB drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DANA and USTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DANA | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -5.32% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.02% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -0.64% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility
DANA vs. USTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DANA | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79% | 1.22% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.79% | 2.02% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.79% | 1.99% | +0.80% |
DANA vs. USTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DANA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USTB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
DANA vs. USTB - Dividend Comparison
DANA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than USTB's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DANA Dana Limited Volatility ETF | 2.08% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.55% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 4.49% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 2.59% | 2.69% | 2.32% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DANA and USTB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USTB is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USTB is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DANA.
USTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 2.08% for DANA.
They also come from different issuers: Dana and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DANA and 0.34% for USTB.
Find the right allocation for DANA and USTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer