PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DALCX vs. FASPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DALCX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dean Mid Cap Value Fund (DALCX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DALCX achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 20.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DALCX having a 10.52% annualized return and FASPX not far ahead at 10.56%.


DALCX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
11.15%
6M
12.36%
1Y
19.18%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
10.52%

FASPX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.04%
YTD
20.37%
6M
23.46%
1Y
41.63%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DALCX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DALCX
Dean Mid Cap Value Fund
11.15%9.49%16.50%12.82%-4.68%28.25%-2.05%26.96%-11.07%15.11%
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
20.37%7.76%-2.60%19.93%-7.82%32.65%7.70%33.85%-17.27%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between DALCX and FASPX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.93

The correlation between DALCX and FASPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DALCX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DALCX
DALCX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DALCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DALCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DALCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DALCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DALCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FASPX
FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DALCX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dean Mid Cap Value Fund (DALCX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DALCXFASPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

2.41

-0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

3.42

-1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

4.08

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.08

15.11

-8.03

DALCX vs. FASPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DALCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FASPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DALCX and FASPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DALCXFASPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.41

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.38

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.48

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.41

+0.18

Drawdowns

DALCX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DALCX drawdown since its inception was -41.99%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DALCX and FASPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DALCXFASPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.99%

-70.11%

+28.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.84%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-34.53%

+18.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.64%

-34.53%

+18.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.99%

-48.02%

+6.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

0.00%

-2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-9.83%

+5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.66%

-0.03%

Volatility

DALCX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dean Mid Cap Value Fund (DALCX) is 3.40%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that DALCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DALCXFASPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

4.27%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

11.93%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

17.03%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

20.68%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

22.01%

-4.21%

DALCX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DALCX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

DALCX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison

DALCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, less than FASPX's 7.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DALCX
Dean Mid Cap Value Fund
5.55%6.17%7.23%5.42%5.38%5.42%0.88%8.28%3.50%2.61%0.43%0.14%
FASPX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M
7.75%9.32%0.00%2.40%1.93%7.80%0.55%4.98%15.67%7.26%21.61%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


DALCX and FASPX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASPX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to DALCX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DALCX dropped -41.99% vs FASPX's -70.11%.

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DALCX and FASPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer