DAK vs. ITOT
DAK (Dakota Active Equity ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DAK is actively managed, while ITOT is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DAK charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
DAK vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DAK having a 8.35% return and ITOT slightly higher at 8.76%.
DAK
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOT
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.67%
DAK vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DAK Dakota Active Equity ETF | 8.35% | 7.36% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 8.76% | 7.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAK and ITOT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAK vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
DAK
ITOT
DAK vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAK | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 0.57 | +1.15 |
Drawdowns
DAK vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAK drawdown since its inception was -7.87%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAK and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAK | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -55.20% | +47.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -2.95% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -6.97% | +5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
DAK vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAK | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 12.51% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 17.39% | -6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 18.28% | -6.89% |
DAK vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAK has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAK vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
DAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ITOT's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAK Dakota Active Equity ETF | 0.56% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DAK and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DAK.
ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.56% for DAK.
They also come from different issuers: Dakota Wealth and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DAK and 0.03% for ITOT.
Find the right allocation for DAK and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer