DAIOX vs. LSGBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX) and Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX).
DAIOX is managed by Dunham. It was launched on Oct 31, 2013. LSGBX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 9, 1991.
Performance
DAIOX vs. LSGBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAIOX vs. LSGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAIOX Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund | -0.59% | 5.68% | 5.33% | 12.18% | -14.11% | -2.18% | 3.85% | 3.82% | -5.00% | 9.50% |
LSGBX Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund | -1.87% | 8.52% | -2.46% | 5.48% | -17.18% | -4.94% | 13.49% | 7.52% | -2.49% | 8.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAIOX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than LSGBX's -1.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DAIOX having a 0.91% annualized return and LSGBX not far ahead at 0.94%.
DAIOX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 5.00%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- 0.91%
LSGBX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- -2.03%
- 10Y*
- 0.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAIOX vs. LSGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAIOX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGBX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAIOX vs. LSGBX — Risk / Return Rank
DAIOX
LSGBX
DAIOX vs. LSGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX) and Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAIOX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 0.83 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 1.23 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.46 | +0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 5.18 | +3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAIOX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.83 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.32 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.16 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.78 | -0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAIOX and LSGBX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DAIOX vs. LSGBX - Dividend Comparison
DAIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than LSGBX's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAIOX Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund | 3.90% | 4.22% | 4.16% | 4.56% | 7.17% | 2.88% | 2.23% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.11% | 1.10% | 0.05% |
LSGBX Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.31% | 4.94% | 1.75% | 0.66% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DAIOX vs. LSGBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAIOX drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, roughly equal to the maximum LSGBX drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAIOX and LSGBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAIOX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.58% | -26.86% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -4.05% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.80% | -25.41% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.96% | -26.86% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -13.99% | +11.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -4.76% | -4.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 1.14% | -0.55% |
Volatility
DAIOX vs. LSGBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX) is 1.68%, while Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that DAIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAIOX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 1.83% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 3.70% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27% | 6.24% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 6.59% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 5.79% | +0.15% |