PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DAIOX vs. DCEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DAIOX vs. DCEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX) and Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAIOX achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than DCEMX's 33.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DAIOX has underperformed DCEMX with an annualized return of 1.02%, while DCEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.32% annualized return.


DAIOX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.92%
YTD
2.62%
6M
2.86%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
1.02%

DCEMX

1D
2.47%
1M
9.86%
YTD
33.14%
6M
37.52%
1Y
60.81%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
8.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DAIOX vs. DCEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DAIOX
Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund
2.62%5.68%5.33%12.18%-14.11%-2.18%3.85%3.82%-5.00%9.50%
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
33.14%28.90%4.84%6.16%-25.20%-7.30%23.89%21.88%-20.99%32.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DAIOX and DCEMX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013

0.18

The correlation between DAIOX and DCEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DAIOX vs. DCEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DAIOX
DAIOX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DAIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DAIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DCEMX
DCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DAIOX vs. DCEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX) and Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DAIOXDCEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

2.99

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

3.73

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.53

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

4.33

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.61

16.34

-5.73

DAIOX vs. DCEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DAIOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the DCEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAIOX and DCEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DAIOXDCEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.99

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.28

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.46

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.23

-0.16

Drawdowns

DAIOX vs. DCEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAIOX drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, smaller than the maximum DCEMX drawdown of -70.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAIOX and DCEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DAIOXDCEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.58%

-70.65%

+43.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.58%

-13.89%

+11.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.91%

-16.83%

+12.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.80%

-41.04%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.96%

-45.88%

+20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-26.15%

+16.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

3.68%

-3.06%

Volatility

DAIOX vs. DCEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund (DAIOX) is 0.95%, while Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund (DCEMX) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that DAIOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DAIOXDCEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

8.96%

-8.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

17.91%

-15.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19%

20.95%

-17.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.65%

18.16%

-13.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.89%

18.28%

-12.39%

DAIOX vs. DCEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAIOX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DCEMX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DAIOX vs. DCEMX - Dividend Comparison

DAIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than DCEMX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAIOX
Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund
3.96%4.22%4.16%4.56%7.17%2.88%2.23%0.23%0.42%0.11%1.10%0.05%
DCEMX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock Fund
1.63%2.17%0.00%0.12%0.00%9.47%0.00%0.26%1.00%0.38%1.27%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DAIOX and DCEMX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCEMX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to DAIOX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAIOX dropped -27.58% vs DCEMX's -70.65%.

DCEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DAIOX and DCEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer